If you agree with the following, please 'like' the Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/CT4SH/
I submitted the following letter to both newspapers this week:
Dear Sir,
The delay in
the opening of our airport to commercial flights gives us an opportunity to
re-visit one of the bad decisions made in the haste to rush air access into
being for May 2016. And this one has got
nothing to do with wind or runway alignment.
I’m talking about the decision to route our primary air service to Johannesburg , rather than Cape Town .
We are told that
the international tour operators charged with bringing the supposed 30,000
tourists per annum to St. Helena and thereby saving our economy, removing our
dependency on the UK for financial support and making us all rich, prefer
Johannesburg. Their preference would
seem to have been the reason, possibly the only reason, behind the Johannesburg
decision. But let’s examine this more
closely.
Yes, Johannesburg airport has lots of international
connections, but so does Cape Town .
You can fly daily between Cape Town and both London and Frankfurt, two of Europe’s biggest hubs, and there
are regular flights from Cape Town
to many other world destinations, moving nearly 10 million passengers per annum. Cape Town is South Africa ’s second largest airport; not quite
as big as Johannesburg ,
but not small either.
And aren’t the
majority of these tourists supposed to be coming from South Africa
anyway? Isn’t that why direct flights to
Europe were abandoned in favour of the South
African hub? To a South African, Cape Town or Johannesburg
makes very little difference. If you
live closer to Johannesburg , there are cheap,
frequent shuttle flights to Cape Town
or even the train. Nobody is going to
refuse to visit St. Helena simply because they have to fly from Cape Town rather than Johannesburg .
The Johannesburg
decision simply does not add up.
With a rumoured
three-year delay in opening the airport for commercial flights the existing contract
with Comair must be all but dead and should not handicap our thinking. There is plenty of time to set up a new
contract with a more sensible African destination.
The rationale
for selecting Johannesburg
was, frankly, as faulty as the airport’s runway layout. Our Government can do little about the latter
but the former is definitely within its grasp.
Let’s think again – and choose Cape
Town .
Yours
sincerely,
John Turner,
Frith’s Cottage, Napoleon St .
Here are a few other relevant facts:
- The Cape Town International Airport was among the winners of the World Travel Awards for being Africa's leading airport. [Wikipedia]
- Cape Town International Airport recently opened a brand new central terminal building that was developed to handle an expected increase in air traffic as tourism numbers increased in the lead-up to the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Other renovations include several large new parking garages, a revamped domestic departure terminal, a new Bus Rapid Transit system station and a new double-decker road system. The airport's cargo facilities are also being expanded and several large empty lots are being developed into office space and hotels. [Wikipedia]
- Cape Town is one of the most multicultural cities in the world, reflecting its role as a major destination for immigrants and expatriates to South Africa. [Wikipedia]
- Cape Town is not only the most popular international tourist destination in South Africa, but Africa as a whole. This is due to its good climate, natural setting, and well-developed infrastructure. [Wikipedia]
- In November 2013, Cape Town was voted the best global city in The Daily Telegraph's annual Travel Awards. [Wikipedia]
I totaly agree with the afformentioned text!
ReplyDelete